Which statement about sensory impairments and credibility is correct?

• A. A witness with an uncorrected sensory impairment is more credible than one without impairment.
• B. A witness with an uncorrected sensory impairment is less credible than a witness without impairment.
• C. Sensory impairment has no impact on credibility.
• D. Only physical disabilities affect credibility.

Answer: (B)

Credibility rests on the witness’s ability to perceive, interpret, and recount events accurately. When a witness has an uncorrected sensory impairment, their observation quality and recall of details can be compromised, which naturally raises questions about the reliability of their testimony compared to someone without such impairment. Because perception underpins what is told and how consistently it can be remembered, uncorrected sensory impairment tends to reduce perceived reliability. If the impairment is corrected or accommodations are provided—like glasses, hearing aids, or an interpreter—the impact on credibility is lessened. The other statements ignore how perception affects reliability and falsely suggest impairment has no effect or that only physical disabilities matter.